Scrubbers Payback Time Likely To Lower Over Bunker Price Forward Curve

1394

A peek into the bunker prices of forward contracts for the first quarter of 2020 suggests the economics of installing scrubbers on ships may be put into question, writes Seatrade Maritime News Asia Correspondent Lee Hong Liag

Reduced Economic Benefits for Scrubber Owners

Owners opting for the scrubber option in order to continue burning the less expensive high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO), as opposed to procuring the more costly compliant 0.5% bunker fuels from 1 January 2020, may see reduced economic benefits as the price spread between the HSFO and low sulphur fuel oil (LSFO) is not wide as they had hoped.

  • According to information shared by Lloyd’s Register’s global FOBAS manager Douglas Raitt at a recent industry seminar, the price spread between HSFO and LSFO is seen at Mean of Platts Singapore (MOPS) $45 on the forward curve during the first quarter of 2020. Currently, the price spread is at slightly below $90.
  • These figures have gone down significantly since the early part of this year when available information on the price spread was indicated at more than $200.
  • According to data from Ship & Bunker website, the spread between Singapore high sulphur 380 cst grade and the 0.5% sulphur material has ranged from $100 to $120 in the past week.
  • But Martyn Lasek, editor of Ship & Bunker, stressed that until very recently, there has been zero or near zero demand for 0.5% fuels, no spot demand and hence no meaningful spot indices that can allow owners to make informed decisions.

Scrubbers Economically Viable?

The driving force behind owners’ investment in scrubbers has been the potentially much lower price of HSFO post-2020, making scrubbers economically viable as opposed to needing to purchase the higher priced 0.5% fuels. The bigger the price spread, the higher in cost savings and shorter payback period for those using scrubbers.

A DNV GL study published in October 2018 had suggested that if the spread drops to just $40, there would be no business case for a 20MW scrubber, while a $100 spread would see a payback period of less than two years.

Did you subscribe to our daily newsletter?

It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!

Source: Seatrade Maritime News