US–EU Strike 15% Tariff Deal to Avert Trade War

33

  • U.S. reduces proposed tariffs on EU goods from 30% to 15%, averting a looming trade war.
  • The EU pledges $600 billion in U.S. investments and up to $750 billion in energy purchases.
  • While Germany welcomes the deal, France and others criticize it as a strategic concession.

In a surprise summit held in Scotland, U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck a last-minute agreement to reduce trade tensions, reports Reuters.

The deal enforces a 15% tariff on most EU goods entering the U.S.—half the original threat of 30%—in exchange for significant economic commitments from the EU. The agreement aims to stabilize transatlantic trade flows and signals a temporary truce in escalating tensions that had rattled global markets in recent weeks.

Economic Wins for the U.S.

The EU pledged approximately \$600 billion in new investments into American infrastructure, manufacturing, and technology sectors. It also committed to purchasing up to $750 billion in U.S. energy exports, including natural gas and renewables, over the next several years.

These measures are expected to boost American exports, create jobs, and reduce trade imbalances, while giving U.S. producers expanded access to European demand.

Tariff Details and Industry Impact

While the blanket tariff on most EU imports will now be capped at 15%, several sectors received special consideration. No new tariffs will be applied to commercial aircraft, semiconductors, generic pharmaceuticals, and certain critical agricultural and chemical goods.

However, steel and aluminum imports from the EU remain subject to existing 50% duties, and other sectors—such as wines, spirits, and luxury goods—will be discussed in follow-up negotiations.

Europe’s Divided Response

German officials praised the agreement as a necessary compromise to protect key industries, particularly its automotive sector. With Germany’s economy heavily reliant on exports, avoiding a tariff escalation was seen as vital.

In contrast, France sharply criticized the deal, calling it one-sided and politically motivated. Some EU leaders expressed concern that the bloc had conceded too much in exchange for short-term relief from tariffs.

Strategic and Political Implications

The deal may de-escalate trade tensions in the short term, but it introduces new risks. Critics argue that the agreement lacks clear enforcement mechanisms and could leave the EU vulnerable to future U.S. pressure.

Additionally, the EU’s large-scale commitments could place fiscal strain on member states already grappling with inflation, slow growth, and political instability.

The framework must still be ratified by individual EU member states, and negotiations will continue to resolve remaining issues, including non-tariff barriers, digital trade, and quota management.

The U.S. retains the right to reimpose higher tariffs if it believes the EU is not honoring its investment and purchasing commitments—leaving the deal both powerful and fragile.

Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?

It’s Free Click here to Subscribe!

Source: Reuters