Shipping traffic can be a major source of tiny plastic particles floating in the sea, especially out in the open ocean. In a paper published in the scientific journal Environmental Science & Technology, a team of German environmental geochemists based at the University of Oldenburg’s Institute of Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment and led by Dr. Barbara Scholz-Boettcher for the first time provides an overview of microplastics mass distribution in the North Sea, reports Phys.

Plastic waste on busy shipping routes

The scientists found that most of the plastic particles in water samples taken from the German Bight, an area in the south-eastern corner of the North Sea which encompasses some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, originate from binders used in marine paints. “Our hypothesis is that ships leave a kind of ‘skid mark’ in the water which is of similar significance as a source of microplastics as tire wear particles from cars are on land,” Scholz-Boettcher says.

In the autumn of 2016 and 2017, the Oldenburg team took water samples from various locations in the German Bight with the research vessel Heincke. Scholz-Boettcher and her two colleagues Christopher Dibke and Marten Fischer used stainless steel sieves to filter plastic particles of much less than one millimeter in diameter out of the seawater and then analyzed the chemical composition of the collected particles. They used a special analytical method in which the plastic molecules were first heated to temperatures of almost 600 degrees Celsius to break them down into smaller, characteristic fragments, and then separated and assigned to different polymer groups based on their mass and chemical properties.

With this method the researchers were also able to quantify the mass of each plastic type. “Previous studies have only measured particle numbers for the North Sea. We, for the first time, also determined the mass distribution, and thus obtained a more comprehensive picture of the emergence of the different plastic types,” Scholz-Boettcher stresses.

Astonishing results

The team was surprised by the results: the samples contained above all indicators for polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polymers known as acrylates, and polycarbonates. Their mass accounted for about two-thirds of the total microplastic content in the mean and up to 80 percent in certain samples. Packaging plastics such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which were previously estimated to make up the bulk of microplastics in the sea, accounted for a much smaller percentage. “We weren’t expecting this distribution pattern,” says Scholz-Boettcher.

When the researchers conducted a more detailed analysis of the results they observed that PE, PP and PET plastics were found mainly near the coastline, whereas in the open North Sea and in the Elbe estuary—particularly in the proximity of major shipping routes—the other types of plastic were predominant. “We believe that these particles originate from ship coatings, where these plastics are used as binders in acrylic paints or epoxy resins, for example,” Scholz-Boettcher explains. These results suggest that far larger quantities of microplastics are produced directly at sea than previously thought.

Harmful effects of paint 

According to the team, literature studies show that in the European Union alone, several thousand tons of paint end up in the marine environment every year. With potentially harmful consequences for the environment: coatings and paints used on ships contain heavy metals and other additives that are toxic to many organisms. These antifouling components are used to protect ships’ hulls from barnacles and other subaquatic organisms and are constantly rubbed off by the wind and waves. The team is currently conducting further studies, for example in river estuaries and in sediments, to gain more insights into how these microplastics enter the environment.

Did you subscribe to our daily newsletter?

It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!

Source: Market Screener