Declining North Europe Port Volumes, Carriers Advised To Follow Schedules

41

  • Rotterdam saw 6.2% less throughput across its box terminals in the first six months, at 7.3m teu, while neighbouring Antwerp-Bruges reported a 4.4% decrease, to 6.8m teu.
  • Rotterdam attributed the volume decline to the loss of traffic to and from Russia, as well as “the ongoing disruption of container logistics”.
  • Jacques Vandermeiren, CEO of the port of Antwerp-Bruges, said the container segment of its business portfolio “continues to pose significant challenges”.

In the first half of this year compared to H1 21, Rotterdam and Antwerp-Bruges, the two biggest hub ports in North Europe, handled fewer containers as reported by GCaptain.

Terminal congestion 

However, extended dwell times meant yard density and terminal congestion increased significantly.

Ocean carriers initially dealt with chronic congestion by skipping calls and Overlanding containers at smaller ports, but the transhipment relay operations have aggravated terminal congestion at the destination hubs.

There are suggestions for more use of night shifts and weekend work to overcome the supply chain disruptions, and there are calls for shipping lines to adhere more closely to their berthing windows to avoid the bunching of vessel calls and the severe pinch points on the terminals.

Rotterdam saw 6.2% less throughput across its box terminals in the first six months, at 7.3m teu, while neighbouring Antwerp-Bruges reported a 4.4% decrease, to 6.8m teu.

Rotterdam attributed the volume decline to the loss of traffic to and from Russia, as well as “the ongoing disruption of container logistics”.

Unreliable arrival times 

The Dutch port handled 5.5% fewer calls in the first half of this year, compared with the previous year, but those vessels saw an average 6.1% increase in their container exchanges.

“This results in peaks of activity at the terminals, which are already very busy since containers are left for longer periods because ship arrival times are more unreliable,” said the port.

Meanwhile, at the newly merged port of Antwerp-Bruges, the authority said its container terminals were “under constant pressure”.

It added: “With globally disrupted container liner shipping, vessel delays and high volumes of import cargo, the container trade continues to face operational challenges.”

Back at Rotterdam, the president of the Rotterdam Terminal Operators’ Association, Rob Bagchus, said “our terminals are too full”.

Fixed windows 

“All those containers staying longer in the terminals take up capacity.

This not only applies to the deepsea terminals but also to the inland terminals and the other storage and transport capacity,” he said.

And Rogier Spoel, senior policy manager, air and sea freight, at Dutch logistics business association evofenedex, wants to tighten up on carriers’ commitment to berthing windows, which is largely being ignored by the alliances due to their immense dominance of the Asia-North Europe trade lane.

He argues that the “fixed windows” for barges and truck appointment systems should be reinforced at deepsea terminals.

“Shipping companies are not, or rarely, reprimanded by the ports if they arrive late,” said Mr Spoel, “people are afraid that the shipping companies will choose a different port in future.”

 

Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?

It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe

Source: GCaptain 

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.