The maritime industry is increasingly adopting vessels that use alternative fuels like LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) and methanol, with some of the first ammonia-fueled ships also on the horizon. This move is a direct response to current emissions regulations and a push to reduce carbon intensity. However, with the IMO (International Maritime Organization) setting a target of net-zero emissions by 2050, fuels derived from fossil sources are considered transitional. The industry will need to eventually switch to truly zero or low-emission options such as biofuels, electrofuels, onboard carbon capture, or zero-carbon fuels like hydrogen and ammonia.
Preparing for the Transition
To successfully navigate this shift, it is crucial to incorporate flexibility into ship design from the newbuilding phase. This includes ensuring adequate space for future alternative fuel systems, selecting compatible materials, and designing systems that can be easily retrofitted with minimal disruption. Conducting early risk assessments, such as HAZID and HAZOP studies, is an effective way to avoid costly changes later in the process. Ship designs must prioritize minimizing and managing accidental releases, especially for liquefied gases.
Safety Considerations for Specific Fuels
Each alternative fuel presents unique risks that must be managed.
- Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Hydrogen: These fuels are highly flammable and require sophisticated detection and containment systems. Hydrogen, in particular, is prone to leakage and requires advanced vacuum-insulated tanks for storage at ultra-low temperatures.
- Ammonia: The primary risks associated with ammonia are its toxicity and corrosive properties. Ship designs must focus on preventing leaks and ensuring that materials are compatible.
- Methanol: This fuel is more flexible and does not require cryogenic storage. Ships designed for conventional methanol can easily switch to green or blue methanol without major structural changes, though its low flash point and near-invisible flame require careful safety protocols.
- Biodiesel: This fuel can be an immediate alternative to conventional fossil fuels but requires addressing risks related to varying purity levels and a shorter shelf life, which may necessitate specific handling and storage considerations.
Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage (OCCS)
Carbon capture systems offer another pathway to reduce emissions. The risks associated with OCCS primarily relate to managing carbon dioxide (CO2), which can cause asphyxiation if released, and handling the solvents used in the capture process. Proper ventilation, monitoring systems, crew training, and adherence to international guidelines are essential for the safe installation and operation of these systems.
Regulatory and Procedural Readiness
The move to new fuels is not just a technical challenge but also a regulatory one. Interim guidelines for alternative fuels are based on the IGF Code, but until they are formally adopted, a risk-based approval process (Alternative Design and Arrangements, or AD&A) is often required by flag states. Furthermore, organizations must ensure that crew training, operational procedures, and emergency preparedness evolve in parallel with the technology to ensure a safe and smooth transition.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free Click here to Subscribe!
Source: DNV
