According to a recent analysis by Breakwave Advisors, the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), set to be enforced from 2026, is poised to significantly impact global dry bulk trade flows. While the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and FuelEU Maritime regulations have already influenced vessel deployment and chartering strategies, CBAM introduces a new layer of complexity.
Understanding CBAM’s Mechanism
CBAM is a climate policy tool that effectively places a carbon price on imported goods entering the EU, based on the emissions generated during their production. The primary objectives are to discourage carbon leakage and encourage non-EU exporters to adopt cleaner industrial processes by aligning their carbon costs with those paid by EU-based producers.
Initially, CBAM will apply to imports of cement, iron & steel, aluminium, fertilizers, and hydrogen. Importers will be required to report embedded emissions and purchase CBAM certificates, priced in line with the EU ETS. The financial impact will be phased in gradually, starting at 2.5% of the ETS price in 2026 and ramping up to 100% by 2034.
Implications for Dry Bulk Trade
While CBAM does not impose a direct cost on shipping like the ETS or FuelEU Maritime, its influence on trade patterns will be substantial. As carbon costs begin to affect the pricing of goods, there is an anticipated shift away from high-emission producers towards lower-emission suppliers. For instance, the EU may see a transition from importing steel from high-emission countries like India to sourcing it from lower-emission countries such as South Korea.
This shift could lead to longer-haul trades in some cases, such as increased imports of Korean steel into Europe. Conversely, certain trades may contract entirely or pivot to intra-regional flows, depending on the carbon intensity of production processes.
Strategic Considerations for the Shipping Industry
The introduction of CBAM necessitates strategic adjustments within the shipping industry. Operators may need to reassess their trade routes and partnerships, considering the carbon footprints of their supply chains. Investing in cleaner technologies and optimizing logistics to reduce emissions could become competitive advantages in a market increasingly influenced by environmental considerations.
In conclusion, while CBAM may not directly affect shipping costs, its ripple effects on trade flows and sourcing decisions are expected to reshape the dry bulk market. Stakeholders within the industry should proactively evaluate the potential impacts and adapt their strategies to align with the evolving regulatory landscape.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free Click here to Subscribe!
Source: Breakwave Advisors
