Global shipping transports around 80% of the world’s cargo. Cargo ships, which form the backbone of this industry, use ballast tanks to maintain stability. According to Marine Insight, these tanks are filled with seawater at the start of a journey and emptied at the destination port.
Major Drawbacks
This traditional conception of cargo water tanks has two major drawbacks:
- the empty ship sailing increases the weight of the ballast tank filled with ocean water, which increases the energy consumption of the ship;
- the seawater loaded in the water tank is discharged, causing marine pollution.
There are about 10 billion tons of cargo water carried by vessels worldwide. Ballast water discharge from vessels on transnational passages has caused the eruption of alien organisms and has been listed as one of the four major hazards of the ocean by the Global Environmental Protection Fund (GEF). At present, Ship owners, business directors, etc., rely on ballast water treatment, similar to heating, electrolysis, and UV treatment.
The United States has espoused several measures, like ballast water relief and retention of operation freights on board. Still, these ballast water treatment technologies aren’t only time-consuming and labor-intensive, increasing operating costs and ultimately reducing owner profit. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) estimates that ballast water discharges harbor billions of organisms daily, posing a significant threat to biodiversity.
Considering this, a race has begun worldwide to find a cost-effective solution to this great engineering problem.
Here, we take a deep dive into the captivating prospects of Ballast-free ships. This revolutionary idea will surely change the norm of ship construction and usher in a new era in the maritime sector. Ballast-laden ships have been the norm since the late 19th century, and until the late 2000s, the problem of ballast water discharge was not recognized.
The Adverse Effects
The issue of invasive species through ballast water discharge is a significant concern for marine biologists and conservationists. Microscopic organisms like plankton, along with more giant creatures like fish larvae and crustaceans, can be inadvertently transported in ballast tanks.
When released in foreign ports, these organisms can establish themselves in new environments, disrupting the delicate balance of native ecosystems. Invasive species can out-compete native species for food and resources, alter food webs, and even introduce diseases.
Ballast-Free Ships
Ballast-free ships offer a revolutionary solution to our problem at hand. This particular concept was independently pitched by the University of Michigan, Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering and Shipbuilding Research Center of Japan( SRCJ).
All of them pitched various ideas and different solutions for the Removal of conventional ballast tanks. Let us take a look at a few approaches:-
Flow-through Ballast Trunks: One approach utilizes a system of longitudinal structures called ballast trunks. These ingenious trunks run along the bottom of the ship, essentially becoming an extension of the hull. In loaded conditions, the trunks remain empty, offering minimal resistance to water flow. However, seawater is strategically allowed to flood the trunks during ballast voyages through controlled inlets and outlets.
This flooding adjusts the ship’s draft and ensures stability. The design often incorporates a pressure differential between the bow (front) and stern (rear) of the ship, creating a continuous seawater flow within the ballast trunks.
This continuous flow helps to minimize the risk of invasive species establishing themselves within the system. However, challenges remain in optimizing the flow rate and pressure differentials to ensure adequate stability across various sea conditions and cargo loads. Additionally, the structural integrity of the ballast trunks under stress requires careful consideration during design and material selection.
Hull Form Optimization: Another captivating approach leverages the inherent buoyancy of the ship itself. Naval architects can meticulously design the hull form to achieve the desired draft in ballast conditions.
This can involve strategic variations in the hull shape, such as a wider beam or a more U-shaped hull section. These modifications can increase the underwater volume of the empty ship, providing the necessary buoyancy without ballast water. Furthermore, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can be employed to optimize the hull form for minimal drag and improved fuel efficiency.
Variable Buoyancy Chambers
- This approach uses strategically placed compartments within the hull that can be filled with air or water to achieve the desired level of buoyancy.
- Imagine compartments functioning like air pockets in a life vest.
- This method offers greater flexibility in draft control compared to longitudinal trunks.
- A fully loaded ship might require some chambers to be flooded for stability, while an empty ship could utilize air-filled chambers for optimal fuel efficiency.
- Advantages: High degree of flexibility in draft control, potentially improved fuel efficiency.
- Disadvantages: Increased complexity in design and construction may require additional piping and control systems.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free Click here to Subscribe!
Source: Marine Insight
