Forget Global Warming – Emissions Can Adversely Affect Lungs!

1835

A Study: Ship Engine Emissions Adversely Affect Macrophages

emission

A Recent study found that exposure to particle emissions from heavy fuel oil (HFO) and diesel fuel (DF) adversely affects human lung cells and is responsible for strong biological responses of the cells.

Munich Scientists analyzed the human lungs and other organisms affected by the exposure to particle emissions from Heavy Fuel oil and Diesel fuel and published the results in the journal PLOS ONE.

The study was conducted in cooperation with colleagues of the University of Rostock, the University of Luxembourg, the Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and the University of Eastern Finland.

In 2015, they already showed that exposure to particle emissions from heavy fuel oil (HFO) and diesel fuel (DF) adversely affects human lung cells and is responsible for strong biological responses of the cells (“How Ship Emissions Adversely Affect Lung Cells”).

Inflammatory processes triggered may influence the development of interstitial lung diseases.  Now the team led by Professor Ralf Zimmermann has found in further studies that macrophages are also influenced by the exhaust gases.  These are much more sensitive than lung epithelial cells and therefore react more strongly to exposure.

Zimmermann is speaker of the international consortium Helmholtz Virtual Institute of Complex Molecular Systems in Environmental Health (HICE), head of the cooperation group Comprehensive Molecular Analytics (CMA) at Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen and head of the Department of Analytical Chemistry at the University of Rostock.

Sean Sapcariu, first author of the study and doctoral student at the University of Luxembourg, a cooperation partner in HICE, observed that macrophages are known as scavenger cells of the immune system and respond more sensitively to particulate matter in the lungs than lung epithelial cells, since they are the ‘first line of response’ against foreign invaders in the lungs such as germs or even fine dust particles.

The team found that the ship emissions of heavy fuel oil and diesel fuel had different effects on triggering pro-inflammatory reactions.  Fine particles from heavy fuel oil emissions have a stronger effect on the development of pro-inflammatory reactions than particles emitted from diesel ship engines.  However, the latter more strongly influences other fundamental biological processes such as DNA-, RNA- and protein-synthesis.

The emitted particles both from the heavy fuel oil and from the diesel exhaust had similarly high toxic effects on the macrophages.  Surprisingly, the toxic effects leading to cell death are even slightly lower in the heavy fuel oil emissions, although the concentrations of known toxic pollutants in the heavy oil emissions are much higher.

Foregoing the ban of the heavy fuel oil use in coastal shipping, as is currently propagated and partially already implemented via the current fuel-sulfur content regulations, is therefore probably less beneficial than expected for protecting the health of people in coastal areas.

The simplest and safest way to mitigate these adverse health effects from ship engine emissions would be to introduce efficient particle reducing measures such as exhaust gas scrubbers and particle filters.  These would precipitate the harmful fine particles from the emissions and thus reduce the adverse health effects, irrespective of the fuel used.  There is an urgent need for action by policy makers in government and by national and European regulatory authorities.

Did you subscribe for our daily newsletter?

It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!

Source: ScienceDaily