- Gard has seen an increased public focus on environmental standards as well as working conditions at shipyards all around the world.
- The decision of which yard to contract sits with the shipowner,but additional ESG information can be useful in the decision-making process and can also beused in the shipowner’s own sustainability reporting.
Shipowners should be careful about Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks when selecting repair or recycling yards. Gard will now offer additional guidance on the topic, aiming to make it easier for owners to identify the most sustainable options.
Lately, there is an increased public focus on environmental standards as well as working conditions at shipyards all around the world. Media reports have exposed poor health and safety conditions, labor rights violations, and environmental damage at some of these yards, raising concerns about the human rights and sustainability impacts of shipbuilding, ship repair and ship recycling.
This is why Gard has decided to offer more guidance on the topic. More specifically, shipowners that are in the process of contracting with repair and recycling yards will be able to benefit from guidance from Gard, making it easier to identify potential risks and to choose the best option. Ultimately, the decision of which yard to contract sits with the shipowner, but additional ESG information can be useful in the decision-making process and can also be used in the shipowner’s own sustainability reporting.
Poor health and safety standards
- Potential adverse impacts on human rights at shipyards and scrapyards include:
- Poor health and safety standards, increasing the risk of accidents and injuries
- Workers may lack necessary health and safety training and proper personal protective equipment
- Large number of temporary /contract workers, increasing the risks of labor rights violations and exploitation
- Temporary and migrant workers are particularly at risk of abuse due to elevated recruitment fees paid to manning agencies, increasing the risk of debt bondage and forced labor
- Tight timeframe detriments labor standards (e.g. excessive overtime; inadequate compensation) and may be reprimanded if workers voice their complaints
- Recruitment and employment agencies are not effectively monitored
- Dismantling is carried out on unregulated ship breaking yards, increasing risk of injuries, accidents and fatalities
- Ship breaking is carried out in countries with weak regulatory framework and law enforcement, increasing risks of worker exploitation
- Toxic spills and water pollution cause adverse effects on seafarers, dockworkers and local communities.
Gard advice
Gard advises all shipowners conducting repairs or recycling ships to investigate which standards the potential yards adhere to and whether they are certified within ESG topics.
It is recommended that an invitation to tender or a single request for a repair quotation should include a questionnaire with a request for the bidder to report their status on the following topics:
- Quality Management System (QMS) as ISO 9001 or equivalent
- Environmental Management System, ISO 14001 or equivalent
- Health and Safety Management (HSE) Working conditions and environment, ISO 45001, OHSAS 18001, ILO Safety and health in shipbuilding and ship repair, or equivalent
- Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, ISO 26000 or equivalent
- Company Code of Conduct relating to anti-corruption, bribery, and money laundering
Clients with H&M insurance on Nordic Marine Insurance Plan (NMIP) terms will have the right to be compensated for reasonably incurred extraordinary costs resulting from specified ESG considerations in the choice of contractor for repairs. There may not be similar provisions to the NMIP Clauses in other standard Hull terms for more expensive offers, based solely on sustainability and ESG considerations. However, ESG factors may still be a decisive factor when comparing offers that are otherwise equal or close to equal.
Governing regulation
Gard, being headquartered in Norway, is subject to the Norwegian Transparency Act which requires that we conduct due diligence to assess whether our operations have actual or potential adverse impact on human rights and decent working conditions. It also requires us to report on the assessment findings and the actions we have taken as part of our due diligence measures for our own operations including our suppliers and business partners. Many countries have similar regulations in place.
This means that when Gard is involved as an insurer in a wreck removal operation, we will inquire with potential contractors, whether they have policies and certificates in place to avoid any detriment to human rights in all areas of the planned operation. For ship recycling, Gard will also request from potential recycling yards that they are compliant with local law and the Hong Kong Convention or the EU Ship Recycling Regulation, whichever is applicable.
The EU will now expand on these requirements for companies doing business within the EU through the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and potentially also the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). These directives will work similarly as the Norwegian Transparency Act for social and human rights issues but will also encompass environmental and governance concerns.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe
Source: Gard
