A recent news article published in the Loadstar states that IMO moves to address well-to-tank emissions from shipping.
IMO’s consideration
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) will consider the entire life-cycle of fuels, known as well-to-wake, rather than just tank-to-wake greenhouse gas emissions, in future regulations in apparent recognition of loopholes in existing emissions rules.
Following the meeting of the IMO’s Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (ISWG-GHG 11) last week, the IMO is set to introduce “robust lifecycle GHG/carbon intensity guidelines for all types of fuels, in order to prepare for an implementation programme for effective uptake of alternative low-carbon and zero-carbon fuels”.
The well-to-wake or ‘lifecycle’ measurement would take into account emissions incurred in upstream sourcing and the production processes of fuels.
Ammonia made from Hydrogen
For example, future fuel candidate ammonia is made from hydrogen, which can be manufactured using renewable energy to electrolyse water.
However, most hydrogen manufacturing continues to be dominated by fossil fuel feedstocks – often coal.
‘Reforming’ processes are conducted using a fossil fuel, LNG, oil or coal, under pressure and at high temperatures, which can be far more polluting than burning the fuel in an internal combustion engine.
These processes cause more CO2 to be emitted at the upstream phase – ‘well-to-tank’ – than burning fuel oil in a ship engine emits at the funnel – ‘well-to-wake’ – and currently, over 90% of global hydrogen production is derived using these methods.
Structure of previous regulations
However, the structure of previous regulations for ship emissions has only measured greenhouse gas emissions from “tank-to-wake” – zero in the case of hydrogen – which would allow fossil majors to incur cataclysmic damage to the environment while selling an “emission free” product to end users.
“Candidate future low-carbon and zero-carbon fuels for shipping have diverse production pathways (for example, different generations of biofuels, hydrogen-based fuels, etc.) entailing significant differences in their overall environmental footprint,” IMO said in a statement.
A study for IMO by Ricardo Energy & Environment, published in December, indicated that if well-to-tank calculations were omitted from future regulation or legislation, they would “be missing significant emissions sources.
“Currently, the emissions from shipping are calculated by applying the appropriate fuel CO2-equivalent factor by the amount of fuel used. For traditional liquid fossil fuels such as HFO, this method could be considered sufficient albeit incomplete.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe
Source: The LoadStar
