Dry bulk spot rates move closer
With the strongest first quarter for Capesizes in 14 years behind us, dry bulk rates have now moved closer to the typical rate for this time of the year, with the Baltic Dry Index sitting at roughly 15% above the 7-year average. Yet, expectations remain high, with the futures curve still in contango (futures above spot), especially for the more volatile Capesize vessels, something that has been the case for months now. However, such prospects, as priced by the futures curve, have declined significantly from the extremes of March as reality slowly settled in, and the second quarter rates seem to converge closer to the low-20,000 level versus the mid-30,000 that the futures were at first pointing to. We believe the pattern of initially higher futures pricing and lower eventual settlements will remain the case for the third quarter as well, given the looser supply/demand balance during the summer months. The impact of record-high asset prices on sentiment remains the main reason, in our view, for the elevated futures curve. Unlike previous instances of spikes in freight futures, this time around, sentiment is the main driving force behind such a bullishness and the secondhand vessel market is greatly contributing to the overall optimism around dry bulk. However, as futures continue to settle lower and losses amongst holders accumulate, it’s the cash flow reality that might eventually force the change and bring asset prices closer to historical risk-adjusted expected returns. As the summer progresses, opportunities to establish new positions should develop once rate pricing becomes aligned with the reality of underlying freight demand.
Mismatch between iron ore
Historically, China has always been a buyer of any incremental ton of iron ore that hits the water and, so far, that has also been the case. However, with steel production remaining flat at the magic one-billion-ton mark for a third year in a row, elevated iron ore imports are rapidly being converted to inventories, which have been surging for the past six months now. Although still below the record highs reached in 2018, at least for portside stocks, we believe there is a clear mismatch of imports and consumption when it comes to the steelmaking material. Such a mismatch can be resolved in two ways: either a significant decline in future iron ore imports, a clear negative for both iron ore prices as well as freight rates, or a considerable increase in steel production. Yet, the fundamentals for an increase in steel consumption seem absent, as the real estate sector in China remains exceptionally weak and the prospects seem at best flat in terms of demand. The risk for the second half of the year is most likely tilted towards lower iron ore imports given that year-to-date imports are up 7% while steel production is down 3%, making the balance for the rest of the year unfavorable.
Did you Subscribe to our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe
Source: Breakwave
