- CSA 2020 raised concerns over the proposal the EC submitted to IMO on changing its
- scrubber guidelines.
- Proposal was for “evaluation and harmonization” of scrubber discharges across all ports, world-wide.
- Scrubbers are accepted globally by the IMO, EU and others as an accepted means of improving air emissions quality in controlled areas.
- A planned move to avoid open discussion in the absence of credible evidence to justify such a major change from the existing rules.
- Conclusions of the BSH study do not appear to align with Commission’s proposal, it is far from clear if it will contain any suggestion.
The Clean Shipping Alliance 2020 (CSA 2020) expressed strong concerns about a proposal submitted by the European Commission (EC) to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), reports Ajot.
What is the proposal?
European Commission (EC) submitted a proposal which urges the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to change its Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (“scrubber”) guidelines.
The proposal, which the Commission submitted to IMO on the 8 February deadline, calls for “evaluation and harmonization” of scrubber discharges across all ports, world-wide.
The proposal is intended for consideration by the 74th session of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 74) which meets in May, in London.
Deliberate move to avoid discussion
“This proposal is an attempt by the European Commission to push forward restrictions on scrubbers, which are accepted globally by the IMO, EU and others as acceptable means of improving air emissions quality in controlled areas,” said CSA 2020 Executive Director Ian Adams.
“Within two weeks of a draft surfacing, the Commission had taken the proposal to a one-day Working Party review and then submitted it to IMO,” he said.
“Clearly this was planned to avoid the open discussion and deliberation that a proposal with such far-reaching impact requires. In the absence of credible evidence to justify such a major departure from the existing rules, the proposal is instead based mostly on speculation.”
What does CSA 2020 do?
Adams said, CSA 2020 members, from over 30 leading commercial and passenger shipping companies have been investing for years to prepare their ships in time to meet emissions abatement targets in accordance with existing IMO and EU rules, which endorse the use of open and closed-loop scrubbers in all waters.
He added, “To see the Commission take this step within months of the entry-into-force of the Global ECA is beyond disappointing.”
Adams added: “The EC initiative is needlessly creating baseless concerns at a time when there are already very real issues in the maritime industry regarding the future availability, suitability and cost of fuels and the effects on global trade and shipping that this will have. There could also be safety implications should ships be required to change fuels in high traffic areas close to ports.”
“I am sure Brussels is very aware that existing scientific data shows significant air emissions improvement from scrubbers, with no likely impact on the ocean environment, but it appears the submission to IMO was prepared with speed rather than accuracy.”
Lost in assumptions and speculations
In a letter to its membership seen by CSA 2020, a European national shipowners’ association said that the EC submission does not identify any scientific evidence of potential risks.
It is just lost in assumptions and speculation about possible contaminant levels and claimed risk potentials.
Results do not align with proposal
In its proposal, the Commission refers to the interim result of a study to be completed in May 2019 by the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) for the investigation of scrubber wash water from closed loop and open loop systems.
But as the preliminary conclusions of the BSH study do not appear to align with the Commission’s proposal, it is far from clear whether it will contain any suggestion of new restrictions on scrubber wash water.
Did you subscribe for our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!