Commodities show little sign of shaking the bearish momentum amid a slew of economic warnings across the globe. Whether the market wants to push oil much below $90/b amid potential OPEC output cuts, looming Russian sanctions, and the end of SPR releases is the big question. Demand destruction may be met by supply reduction, reports SP Global.
Prices are often a matter of perspective
On one level, the key S&P GSCI commodity index has fallen by more than 20% since peaking in June, but, from another angle, it is still three times higher than in April 2020 when it went on its lengthy bull run.
Dated Brent is now close to pre-war price levels at just below $90/b. After spiking up to close to $140/b on fears of lost Russian barrels, the market did an about-face as inflation and higher interest rates in the West combined with persistent lockdowns in China.
“Oil fundamentals are expected to ease further in Q4 and into 2023 driving prices lower but risks remain with little spare capacity for crude and some key products,” S&P Global Commodity Insights said in a recent research note.
S&P Global expects Dated Brent to average in $90s/b in the fourth quarter and in a similar range into next year, with the structure remaining much flatter as most of the price decline occurs at the front of the forward curve.
China oil demand is falling in 2022 for the first time in decades, and demand growth during the second half of the year is weaker than expected in the US, Western Europe and China.
The macroeconomic picture is full of foreboding signs for global demand. The US Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 75 basis points and pumped up the hawkish volume as it looks to combat core inflation, stripping out volatile food and energy costs, which hit 6.3% year-on-year in August.
Saying that, overall oil demand is still growing, even among the gloomiest of forecasters. And all the evidence is pointing to a recovery in market balances.
Standard Chartered Bank said in a recent research note the market has swung into a large and unheralded surplus.
“Forecasts from consultants and US investment banks of Q3 oil prices of $150/b and higher were mainly based on the assumption of a large deficit; we think the market has not yet fully priced in the extent to which that assumption proved wrong,” the analysts at Standard Chartered wrote.
Commercial global oil stocks have started to build in recent weeks, and many analysts see that trend accelerating in the fourth quarter and through the first part of 2023, even as the US brings the release of strategic petroleum reserves to a close.
Supply destruction
But the threat of further supply curbs is brutally real.
EU sanctions on Russia kick in in early December, and the question looms large as to whether India and China can maintain the same level of interest in Russian crude. Moscow could also retaliate over the G7’s planned price caps on its oil by shutting in swathes of production, wrong-footing the US-led initiative which is intended to keep the oil flowing but hit Putin’s ability to fund the Ukraine war.
“Russian supply loss expectations are still assumed to peak at 1.5 million b/d in Q1 2023,” according to S&P Global research. “Exports remain resilient, but limited buyers and tankers willing to re-route over 3 million b/d is expected to take a toll.”
And OPEC+, producing close to maximum, has already signaled to the market the balance of risks is shifting by deciding to cut output by a symbolic 100,000 b/d at its September meeting. The threat of more sizable output reductions amid historically low spare capacity is certainly a key consideration for the market.
“The justification for $90/b is that the world economy can handle such a price and the only way we can see additional investment to meet future demand … is to keep oil prices at $90/b or above,” said independent oil consultant Anas Al-Hajji.
“A severe recession means that a $90/b floor cannot be defended, also it is not in the interests of OPEC+ to defend $90/b in case of recession … but I believe the hard floor is in the $60s,” he added.
The US release of emergency stocks also adds a level of complication. Reports the US may start repurchasing 180 million barrels of emergency sales if crude falls below $80/b were quickly walked back.
According to S&P Global there could be a potential rethink of SPR policy that could plausibly annul the final 25 million barrel batch of planned emergency sales through Oct. 31, and delay 26 million barrels of fiscal 2023 Congressional sales beyond an assumed delivery timeline of November-December 2022.
Al-Hajji adds “there is no way the Biden administration is going to refill the SPR at these prices.”
MUFG bank analysts added to the argument that commodities react later than financial markets to the economic data. “While elevated commodity prices are driving demand destruction, particularly in Europe and emerging markets, it is critical to emphasize that demand is easing, not contracting,” the bank said.
“Our bullish commodities thesis is neither about inflation risks nor the Fed’s hawkishness. It is about scarcity led by severe underinvestment in commodity capacity that has left supply unable to meet rising demand induced by government policies around redistribution and ESG considerations.”
Ole Hansen, head of commodity research at Saxo Bank, said there could be “pockets of strength” across commodities in energy, metals and agriculture, highlighting “sanctions, upstream cost inflation, adverse weather and a low investment appetite.”
While even recent history teaches us there is neither a true ceiling or floor to oil and commodity prices more widely, only the bravest may wish to choose a clear path ahead.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe
Source: SP Global
