From fire extinguishers and sprinklers to lifeboats and life jackets, ships of all shapes and sizes must be equipped to respond efficiently and effectively to any potential hazards that could put the lives of those onboard at risk.
Man Overboard technology
However, it is not just onboard safety that is important. Ship operators must also consider the appropriate actions to take if a member of a vessel finds themselves overboard.
Man-overboard (MOB) technology is an area that’s attracting increasing attention in the marine industry. Novel capabilities and solutions are being actively designed, developed and deployed to better detect and locate those who have fallen from a ship.
Incidents of this kind are both particularly prevalent and dangerous in the cruise industry. Nearly 400 people are reported to have gone overboard between 2000 to 2020, with around 18 to 20 incidents occurring on cruise ships in an average year.
Cruise Ship Challenge
In the professional maritime industry, tracking MOB incidents are much easier to manage. Organizations can require crew members to use wearables that will immediately signal if they’ve gone over the side. However, this isn’t possible to enforce on cruise ships, creating the need for different technologies that can immediately detect when a passenger falls overboard.
The key word here is immediately. It’s rarely easy finding an overboard individual – with challenging sea conditions, the darkness of night (when most incidents happen) and the difficulty of changing the direction of a ship – all adding difficulties, even if the incident is quickly identified. However, on cruise ships, it can regularly be hours, not minutes, until someone raises the alarm.
In these instances, the Coastguard/emergency rescue has to search for individuals across huge swathes of sea – frequently as much as 5,000 square miles. That’s like searching the waves for a single head in an area the size of Connecticut.As a result, many current approaches to man-overboard incident response remain inadequate. Typically, cameras are used along the sides of a ship, yet these are usually not manned. When individuals are reported missing, crew members will search the ship while looking back through hours and hours of CCTV footage from multiple cameras.
It’s only when they find something in the footage that a man overboard incident is confirmed and the coastguard is alerted. By that point, the process of executing a successful search and rescue has become a case of finding a needle in a haystack.
Challenges In Current Technology
For this reason, more advanced technologies such as LiDAR, RADAR, and thermal cameras with video analytics are beginning to be used to detect a man-overboard incident. These solutions can automatically identify heat signatures or body reflections before sounding the alert as quickly as it’s needed.
However, these systems, used individually, each have their limitations.
A key challenge with automated man-overboard systems is the accuracy of detection. Single beam LiDAR, for example, will act like a tripwire. While that might mean triggering an alarm in a genuine incident, it may also be triggered by anything from wave spray and birds to a hat falling over the railings.
Minimizing such false alarms is critical. Not only do these interfere with the itinerary and safe running of a cruise ship, but, akin to the ‘boy who cried wolf’, they can also lead to alarm fatigue and a lack of response in the case of genuine incidents.
Typically, thermal imagery is used to address the very important task of differentiating between human beings and objects. Used individually, however, similar limitations persist. Cameras are planar arrays, or two-dimensional, meaning it’s impossible to tell how big something is by using just one camera. Multiple cameras facing each other can be used to determine the shape, size, and trajectory of an object, but cost and reliability issues soon start to spiral as more and more optical sensors are introduced.
Changing Regulations
Without these technologies – and with man-overboard incidents still occurring year-on-year – cruise ships remain unable to respond quickly and effectively to maximize the opportunity for safe rescue and recovery.
So, what needs to change?
In 2020, after 4 years of collaboration between the cruise industry, technology vendors, class societies, and regulators, ISO 21195 was published. This goal-based standard provided a baseline for the performance of MOB systems. Specifically, this standard demands that acceptable man overboard detection systems should have a minimum 95% detection probability, and generate no more than one false alarm per day.
Standards such as these provide clarity into how systems perform, which can then inform the implementation of new regulations that demand compliance.
It bears repeating: less than 2% of current cruise ships use effective MOB detection systems. However, with systems that pass ISO standards now within sight, the case for new and tighter regulations is strengthening.
“This is what we’re currently working towards at MARSS with our MOBtronic automated man-overboard system. Having completed phases 1 and 2 of the standards, the technology is set to be tested on a vessel during the final phase before certification”.
Did you subscribe to our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe
Source: Marss
