Paint Spills Banned Chemical Into Conservation Area


The safe limit of TBT is a fifth of a drop but one sample was 80,000 times over the limit, says an article published on GOV.Uk.

Nine-day hearing

International Paint Ltd, owned by multi-national AkzoNobel, appeared before Plymouth Crown Court on Thursday 27 October 2022, where, at the end of a nine-day hearing, it was found guilty on two charges.

Hazardous waste

The company denied both offences relating to the discharge of hazardous waste from a tank located on the quay at its Newton Ferrers paint testing facility.

The case is adjourned until January for sentencing.

Launched investigation

The court heard that the Environment Agency launched an investigation after the company tried to sell the premises in 2015 and possible pollution was reported by Simon Friend of Red Earth Developments.

Anti-fouling paints

International Paint Ltd manufactured paints, including anti-fouling paints for ships, and had run a testing facility on the River Yealm at Newton Creek near Newton Ferrers since 1928.

The estuary is a Special Area of Conservation due to its rich flora and fauna.

Banned worldwide

Since the 1970s, formulations containing tributyltin (TBT) had been used as a coating to prevent the build-up of organisms and plants on ships’ hulls.

But it proved to be so toxic to the wider marine environment that it was banned from use on small vessels in the UK in the late 1980s and was banned completely worldwide during the 2000s.

Pool equals

One drop of TBT in an Olympic-sized swimming pool equals one part per trillion (PPT).

The safe level of TBT is 0.2 PPTor a fifth of a drop.

Sediment escaped

The Environment Agency’s investigation found evidence that the chemical, along with copper, arsenic and mercury, had been present in sediment in the tank at the site and some of the sediment had escaped out into the estuary.

Permanently sealed

A bung on another tank was found to have come out leaving it open to the estuary, before it was eventually permanently sealed with concrete.

The company denied having caused the discharge of the sediment into the estuary but did not answer what had happened to it.

Sample analysis results

Leading expert, Dr Michael Waldock, whose work led to the banning of TBT, carried out a review of sample analysis results from sediment from the tank and from the adjacent estuary for the Environment Agency.

Toxic effect

He found that nine out of 11 samples exceeded the safe limit for TBT and that, close to the site, one sample contained 80,000 times the safe level.

He concluded that the TBT levels in the estuary were sufficient to have had a major toxic effect on marine life there.

Multi-national firm

James Wimpress of the Environment Agency said:

“The company owned by a multi-national firm, and with a turnover of £134m in 2020, failed in its duty of care to the environment. The company denied any wrongdoing during the investigation and throughout the trial.

We are extremely pleased with the outcome and hope this serves as a warning to other companies that we will not hesitate to pursue those that act without regard to their responsibilities.”

Did you subscribe to our newsletter?

It’s free! Click here to subscribe!

Source: GOV.Uk


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.