How to Protect Against Bunker Fuel Camouflaging Problem?

4261

“CAMOUFLAGING PROBLEM” CAUSING PROPERTIES OF BUNKER FUEL  

Dr-R.-Vis-CEO-of-Viswa-Lab1.jpgOver the last few weeks, very interesting analysis results have been identified in  bunker fuels from South East Asia.  The sediment values (ISO 10307‐1 method) are 0.03% to 0.06%.  The stability (ASTM  D4740 method) of these fuels is number 1.  However, the Reserve Stability Number  (RSN) (ASTM D7061) is between 14.7 and 16 (one exception at 9.2) and the Xylene  Equivalent Number (XE) (modified BP 230) from 38 to 45 (Normal Average).  RSN in  normal fuels is below 5 and XE is below 30.  The ASTM D7061 method says “if the separability number is above 10, the stability  reserve of the oil is very low and asphaltenes will easily flocculate, or have already  started to flocculate”.  According to Diesel United‐Sulzer engine Makers technical document, if the Xylene  Equivalent result is high, there is a real risk of fuel pump problems.

As per the Class NK  document “Guidance for Measures to Cope with Degraded Marine Heavy Fuels Version  II”, “When the xylene equivalent becomes greater than 30, problems are likely to  occur.”  When very high values for RSN and XE are observed, the fuel should also normally  show higher sediment values and poor stability values (3, 4,5).  In these cases however,  only marginally increased sediment content is noted and the stability is 1.  

We feel certain that an additive or a blend component is added to the bunker fuel  which suppresses the organic sediment value and bring it within spec.  In this process  the stability test value is also brought to number 1.  It may be argued that when the sediment value is within limits and stability is 1, why  worry about this fuel.

As a matter of fact, these fuels have caused problems in the engines.  They have also  shown presence of contaminants in the GCMS analysis including high levels of styrene  (300 to 600 ppm), indene (500 to 700 ppm) phenols (150 to 1050 ppm).  In addition a  few other contaminants are noted in the fuel.  The type of problems experienced were  piston ring breakage in multiple units and purifier choking.  

So how do we protect against such camouflaging?

We recommend carrying out a XE  and RSN test when the sediment content is greater than 0.03%/0.04% to make sure they are not at levels likely to cause problems.

By

Dr. Vis

President

Viswa Lab

Did you subscribe for our daily newsletter?

It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.