- Work published in Biology Letters showed that lefty shells in garden snails usually originate from an accident during early development, rather than an inherited condition.
- Jeremy’s offspring, grand-offspring and great-grand-offspring didn’t share his and his partner’s ultra-rare shell-coil.
- The finding has relevance to understanding the common factors that define organ and body asymmetry, including in humans.
A global campaign to help find a mate for a left-coiling snail called ‘Jeremy’ has enabled scientists to understand how mirror-image garden snails are formed, reads an article in the conversation.
The findings, published in the journal Biology Letters, show that the rare left-spiralling shell of some garden snails is usually a development accident, rather than an inherited condition.
Jeremy – Snail with a rare left-coiling shell
In October 2016, evolutionary geneticist Dr Angus Davison in the University of Nottingham’s School of Life Sciences appealed to the public for their help in match-making for Jeremy, a garden snail with a rare left-coiling shell.
Dr Davison hoped to use the offspring from Jeremy to study the genetics of this condition, because his previous work on snails had given insight into understanding body asymmetry in other animals, including humans.
But another left-coiling snail had to be found first. As well as a mirror-imaged shell, Jeremy had genitals on the opposite side making it very difficult for the snail to mate with normal snails.
The science to unravel this mystery was made possible by the involvement of the general public in finding a mate for Jeremy, initially via an appeal put out on BBC Radio Four’s Today programme, and then the wider media using #snaillove.
Jeremy became a global sensation and internet ‘shellebrity‘
By bringing together a worldwide group of citizen scientists, and the snails that they had found, Dr Davison used the publicity to understand what makes an exceptional reversed-coiled snail such as Jeremy.
Altogether more than 40 lefty snails were found by citizen scientists, in the wild and from snail farms. Davison and the citizen scientists bred the lefty snails together to test whether their occurrence was due to an inherited condition.
- Over three years, nearly fifteen thousand eggs were hatched from four generations of snails, including Jeremy.
- Initially, Jeremy had been left ‘shell-shocked‘ after being given the cold shoulder by two suitors who seemed to prefer each other.
- Then, shortly before Jeremy’s death, one mate produced a batch of 56 babies, about one-third of which were likely to be ‘fathered‘ by Jeremy.
Factors determining animal asymmetry
The new evidence shows that rare lefty garden snails are not usually produced due to an inherited condition. Instead, they are mainly produced by a developmental accident.
This finding has relevance to understanding the common factors that define animal asymmetry, including humans, and the origin of rare reversed individuals in other animal groups.
Dr Davison said: “After a long search for a mate, and several mishaps along the way, Jeremy finally produced offspring, which delighted me — and the rest of the world. We were then able to use Jeremy’s offspring and the offspring from other lefties to discover how these mirror-imaged individuals are produced.”
Our findings showed that it is usually a developmental accident, rather than an inherited condition, that makes a lefty garden snail.
“We helped solve one of nature’s puzzles, which was very satisfying. There was also a happy ending for Jeremy, the snail, in finding love and producing offspring, albeit just before dying. None of this would have been possible without the public’s help,” he added.
“We have learned that two lefties usually make a right, at least if you are a garden snail. In other snails, being a lefty is an inherited condition, but we still don’t really know how they do it. If we are able to find out, then this may help us understand how the right and left side of other animal bodies are defined, including ourselves.”
“You could say that we tried to recreate what made Jeremy different, but this was not possible. Jeremy was special.”
Did you subscribe to our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!
Source: The Conversation
