Since peaking in Q1 2022, both economic performance and the prognosis for Europe have been trending lower, owing in part to post-Covid-19 developments and the ongoing war in Ukraine. The conflict sparked regional inflation and continues to have an impact on the market in terms of consumer behaviour.
During 2023, the China-North Europe trade lane clearly reflected market trends, and this article delves deeper into the trajectory of retail spot rates on the trade vs the market average.
China dusts itself off
As for the general context, China enjoyed some momentum in economic growth following the lifting of pandemic restrictions in Q1 2023. However, the pick-up in outbound volumes of loaded containers has already lost steam (Source: CTS). After monthly year-on-year increases in March and April, demand fell by 1.3 % in May year on year, indicating a sluggish recovery. This is mirrored by China’s Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for the manufacturing sector. Growth throughout the first quarter, peaking at 52.6 points in February, was followed by a slowdown right across Q2, with the PMI sliding to 49.2 in April, 48.8 in May and 49.0 in June (Source: NBS China).
Despite China’s patchy recovery, retail rates for outbound movements to Europe have continued to weaken due to well-documented overcapacity and slow demand resulting from high inflation. At such times, retailers tend to adopt a more conservative approach to inventory levels while keeping a close eye on the financial situation of consumers. On the positive side, according to Eurostat, wages and salaries in the EU had risen 2.8% by Q3 2022, while the OECD indicates that inflation will continue to fall during the rest of this year.
Prices for ocean freight, meanwhile, show no signs of increasing – or of a typical peak season for retail shippers.
Rate differential narrowed
Retail rates and the general market average have not exactly been ‘in sync’ since the start of the year. From a positive differential of USD 60 per FEU in the first half of January, retail rates were then less expensive in the second half of the month, with a negative differential of almost USD 90 versus the market average. Rates rose again towards the end of January and into February, to marginally above the market average. Since then, the spread has continued narrow, with retail ending the second quarter at USD 5 above the market average.
The February jump may have been down to a shift in demand following Chinese New Year, with European retailers starting to prepare for the summer season. Earlier learnings will determine how they position themselves in the freight market during Q3 – and all bets are open as to whether there will be another increase in rates in the second half.
Did you subscribe to our newsletter?
It’s free! Click here to subscribe!
Source: Xeneta
