In the ever-evolving landscape of ship financing, the maritime industry has witnessed significant transformations over the past decade, particularly in relation to sustainability and environmentally conscious projects, says an article published on Baltic exchange website.
Transformations In Maritime Financing
Over the last decade, the maritime industry has witnessed a profound shift in ship financing, notably fueled by the Poseidon Principles banks, steering 70% of global shipping loans. This transformation revolves around sustainability and eco-conscious projects.
Two Schools Of Thought Emerge
Within this evolving landscape, two distinctive approaches have surfaced: the ‘cancel culture’ and the ‘engage-to-change’ groups.
The former involves banks distancing from less environmentally friendly vessels, while the latter collaborates with ship owners to incentivize and expedite the transition to greener practices.
Poseidon Principles Banks’ Commitment
Pioneers in green financing, Poseidon Principles banks commit to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from financed vessels.
Amid recent approvals for an expedited net-zero policy, these banks now target a 70% emission reduction by 2040 and complete carbon neutrality by 2050.
Challenges For Ship Owners
For ship owners, meeting stringent emission targets poses a significant challenge, requiring substantial changes such as reducing daily heavy fuel oil consumption over nearly three decades.
The ‘Cancel Culture’ Perspective
Some banks opt for a direct approach, automatically excluding environmentally unfriendly vessels from their portfolios. However, oceanis notes that this approach may lack a global perspective, as the refusal to finance a project may lead to substitution by less stringent debt sources.
The ‘Engage-to-Change’ Approach
The ‘engage-to-change’ group takes a collaborative stance, working closely with ship owners to facilitate the ‘greening’ process. This involves offering emission-linked loan margins or retrofit financing, imposing higher costs but providing higher leverage, looser covenants, and longer tenors.
Defining ‘Green’ In Ship Financing
Divergent definitions of a ‘green’ ship among lenders add complexity. Some focus on a vessel’s emissions, while others consider cargo or industry nature. This leads to debates on whether certain vessel types, even if powered by green energy, can be deemed truly ‘green.’
Regulatory Frameworks And Scopes
Regulators introduce three ‘scopes’ for emissions responsibility: Scope 1 covers direct emissions, Scope 2 includes external source emissions, and Scope 3 encompasses all indirect emissions.
New EU reporting rules will compel shipping banks, including Poseidon Principles banks, to disclose emissions based on these scopes, enhancing transparency.
Divide In The Offshore Sector
A clear divide exists in the offshore sector between vessels servicing oil and gas and those dedicated to renewables. Renewable vessel owners leverage green credentials for favorable financing, while oil and gas vessel owners highlight versatility and high specifications.
Competitive Dynamics and Considerations
Poseidon Principles banks, competitive due to their size, face competition from smaller commercial banks less sensitive to environmental concerns.
Ship owners must weigh the benefits of Poseidon Principles margins against alternative financing options, considering reduced interest costs versus potential earnings.
Navigating Financing Waters
In the dynamic seas of ship financing, ship owners face critical decisions amidst environmental shifts, regulatory frameworks, and evolving financing strategies. The balance between green initiatives and economic considerations remains a key challenge in charting the course ahead.
Did you subscribe to our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!
Source: Baltic exchange
