Two Supreme Court Cases Could Change Internet Rules

By
Mfame Editor
-
22498
Credit: tingey-injury-law-firm-unsplash

How two supreme court battles could reshape the rules of the internet, intrigues a Guardian news source.

Upend the rules of the internet

A pair of cases going before the US supreme court this week could drastically upend the rules of the internet, putting a powerful, decades-old statute in the crosshairs.

At stake is a question that has been foundational to the rise of big tech: should companies be legally responsible for the content their users post? Thus far they have evaded liability, but some US lawmakers and others want to change that. And new lawsuits are bringing the statute before the supreme court for the first time.

Both cases were brought by family members of terrorist attack victims who say social media firms are responsible for stoking violence with their algorithms. The first case, Gonzalez v Google, had its first hearing on 21 February and will ask the highest US court to determine whether YouTube, the Google-owned video website, should be held responsible for recommending Islamic State terrorism videos. The second, which will be heard later this week, targets Twitter and Facebook in addition to Google with similar allegations.

Together they could represent the most pivotal challenge yet to section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a statute that protects tech companies such as YouTube from being held liable for content that is shared and recommended by its platforms. The stakes are high: a ruling in favor of holding YouTube liable could expose all platforms, big and small, to potential litigation over users’ content.

While lawmakers across the aisle have pushed for reforms to the 27-year-old statute, contending companies should be held accountable for hosting harmful content, some civil liberties organizations as well as tech companies have warned changes to section 230 could irreparably debilitate free-speech protections on the internet.

Here’s what you need to know.

What are the details of the two cases?

Gonzalez v Google centers on whether Google can be held accountable for the content that its algorithms recommend, threatening longstanding protections that online publishers have enjoyed under section 230.

YouTube’s parent company Google is being sued by the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old US citizen who was studying in Paris in 2015 when she was killed in the coordinated attacks by the Islamic State in and around the French capital. The family seeks to appeal a ruling that maintained that section 230 protects YouTube from being held liable for recommending content that incites or calls for acts of violence. In this case, the content in question was IS recruitment videos.

“The defendants are alleged to have recommended that users view inflammatory videos created by ISIS, videos which played a key role in recruiting fighters to join ISIS in its subjugation of a large area of the Middle East, and to commit terrorist acts in their home countries,” court filings read.

In the case of Twitter v Taameneh, family members of the victim of a 2017 terrorist attack allegedly carried out by IS charged that social media firms are to blame for the rise of extremism. The case targets Google as well as Twitter and Facebook.

What does Section 230 do?

Passed in 1996, section 230 protects companies such as YouTube, Twitter and Facebook from being held legally responsible for content posted by users. Civil liberties groups point out the statute also offers valuable protections for free speech by giving tech platforms the right to host an array of information without undue censorship.

The supreme court is being asked in this case to determine whether the immunity granted by section 230 also extends to platforms when they are not just hosting content but also making “targeted recommendations of information”. The results of the case will be watched closely, said Paul Barrett, deputy director of the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights.

“What’s at stake here are the rules for free expression on the internet,” he said. “This case could help determine whether the major social media platforms continue to provide venues for free expression of all kinds, ranging from political debates to people posting their art and human rights activists telling the world about what’s going wrong in their countries.”

A crackdown on algorithmic recommendations would impact nearly every social media platform. Most steered away from simple chronological feeds after Facebook in 2006 launched its Newsfeed, an algorithmically driven homepage that recommends content to users based on their online activity.

To rein in this technology is to alter the face of the internet itself, Barrett said. “That’s what social media does – it recommends content.”

How have the justices reacted so far?

As arguments in the Gonzalez case began on Tuesday, justices seemed to strike a cautious tone on section 230, saying that changes could trigger a number of lawsuits. Elena Kagan questioned whether its protections were too sweeping, but she indicated the court had more to learn before making a decision.

“You know, these are not like the nine greatest experts on the internet,” Kagan said, referencing herself and the other judges.

Even judges who have historically been tough critics of internet companies seemed hesitant to change section 230 during Tuesday’s arguments, with Clarence Thomas saying it was unclear how YouTube’s algorithm was responsible for abetting terrorism. John Roberts compared video recommendations to a bookseller suggesting books to a customer.

The court will hear arguments on Thursday for the second case regarding tech firms’ responsibility for recommending extremist content.

What is the response to efforts to reform Section 230?

Holding tech companies accountable for their recommendation system has become a rallying cry for both Republican and Democratic lawmakers. Republicans claim that platforms have suppressed conservative viewpoints while Democrats say the platforms’ algorithms are amplifying hate speech and other harmful content.

The debate over section 230 has created a rare consensus across the political spectrum that change must be made, with even Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg telling Congress that it “may make sense for there to be liability for some of the content”, and that Facebook “would benefit from clearer guidance from elected officials”. Both Joe Biden and his predecessor Donald Trump have called for changes to the measure.

What could go wrong?

Despite lawmakers’ efforts, many companies, academics and human rights advocates have defended section 230, saying that changes to the measure could backfire and significantly alter the internet as we know it.

Firms like Reddit, Twitter, Microsoft as well as tech critics like the Electronic Frontier Foundation have filed letters to the court arguing that making platforms liable for algorithmic recommendations would have grave effects on free speech and internet content.

Evan Greer, a free speech and digital rights activist, says that holding companies accountable for their recommendation systems could “lead to widespread suppression of legitimate political, religious and other speech”.

“Section 230 is widely misunderstood by the general public,” said Greer, who also the director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future. “The truth is that Section 230 is a foundational law for human rights and free expression globally, and more or less the only reason that you can still find crucial information online about controversial topics like abortion, sexual health, military actions, police killings, public figures accused of sexual misconduct, and more.”

Did you subscribe to our Newsletter?

It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe.

Source: The Guardian

5657 COMMENTS

  23. This article is fantastic! The way it clarifies things is genuinely captivating and extremely easy to follow. It’s evident that a lot of effort and research went into this, which is truly impressive. The author has managed to make the subject not only intriguing but also delightful to read. I’m eagerly excited about exploring more material like this in the future. Thanks for sharing, you’re doing an remarkable task!

  25. ? Wow, blog ini seperti petualangan fantastis melayang ke galaksi dari keajaiban! ? Konten yang menarik di sini adalah perjalanan rollercoaster yang mendebarkan bagi imajinasi, memicu kagum setiap saat. ? Baik itu teknologi, blog ini adalah sumber wawasan yang inspiratif! ? ? ke dalam pengalaman menegangkan ini dari pengetahuan dan biarkan pikiran Anda terbang! ✨ Jangan hanya mengeksplorasi, rasakan sensasi ini! #BahanBakarPikiran Pikiran Anda akan bersyukur untuk perjalanan mendebarkan ini melalui ranah keajaiban yang tak berujung! ✨

  26. Truly outstanding! The quality of this content is outstanding. The presentation is superb. You can clearly see the care and expertise put into this work. Hats off to the author for offering such an enriching experience. I’m excited to see similar content in the future. ???

  27. Thoroughly enjoyed your article! ? The valuable insights are well-delivered. Consider adding more images in your upcoming pieces to make them visually appealing. ?

  28. Brilliant work! The article is insightful and well-detailed. Adding more visuals in your future articles could make them even more enjoyable for readers.

  30. Курсы психологии онлайн бесплатно с сертификатом.

    Основные темы в психологии.
    Фактор 2 воспоминание. Мышление и
    деятельность обществознание тест.

    Какие два из перечисленных понятий используются в первую очередь при описании
    биологической сферы. Части личности в психологии.
    Явление одновременного цветового контраста носит
    название. Основные задачи психолога.

  31. Воспоминания какие. Что значит формирование личности.
    Регресс сна рассчитать онлайн.

    Отрасли психологии и ее связь с другими
    науками. Наука о законах мышления
    6 букв. Тест по обществознанию 8 класс как стать личностью онлайн.
    Процесс синонимы. В чем проявляется биосоциальная
    сущность человека 8 класс обществознание кратко.

  32. Аренда виртуальных серверов (VPS/VDS хостинг)
    – Возможность арендовать сервер РЅР° 1 час или 1 сутки
    – Для сервера сеть РЅР° скорости 1 Гбит!
    – Дата-центр РІ РњРѕСЃРєРІРµ Рё Амстердаме
    – Круглосуточная техническая поддержка – бесплатно
    – FASTPANEL Рё HestiaCP – бесплатно
    – Более 15 000 сервер уже РІ работе
    – Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS, Oracle 9 – бесплатно
    – Отлично РїРѕРґС…РѕРґРёС‚ РїРѕРґ A-Parser
    – Windows – 2022, 2019, 2016, 2012 R2
    – Outline VPN, WireGuard VPN, IPsec VPN.
    – Быстрые серверы СЃ NVMe.
    – Мгновенное развёртывание сервера РІ несколько кликов – бесплатно
    – Windows – 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 – бесплатно
    – Отлично РїРѕРґС…РѕРґРёС‚ РїРѕРґ CapMonster
    – Управляйте серверами РЅР° лету.
    – Отлично РїРѕРґС…РѕРґРёС‚ РїРѕРґ GSA Search Engine Ranker
    – Скорость порта подключения Рє сети интернет — 1000 РњР±РёС‚/сек
    – Почасовая оплата
    – Автоматическая установка Windows – бесплатно
    – Отлично РїРѕРґС…РѕРґРёС‚ РїРѕРґ Xneolinks
    – Отлично РїРѕРґС…РѕРґРёС‚ РїРѕРґ XRumer + XEvil
    – Супер (аптайм, скорость, РїРёРЅРі, нагрузка)

  35. Программа обучения лидерство. Книги лидерство купить. Типы лидерства в психологии. Теория лидерства в менеджменте. Концепция ситуационного лидерства книга. Теоретиком политического лидерства является. Основная характеристика современного института лидерства. Признаки политического лидерства.

  37. Hebat, blog ini sangat keren! ? Isinya penuh energi dan penuh semangat. ? Selalu mendapatkan informasi baru dan menarik di sini. ? Teruskan semangat berbagi! ?? Artikel ini benar-benar menarik hati! ? Terima kasih atas sumber inspirasinya! ?✨ #EnergiTinggi #Informatif #SangatSuka

  40. Холоп 2 фильм 2023. Холопы. Когда выйдет холоп 2. Холоп лордфильм. Холоп 2 трейлер на русском. Холоп фильм смотреть онлайн. Холоп 2 фильм 2023. Холоп это.

  49. Психическое здоровье включает в себя
    наше эмоциональное, психологическое и социальное благополучие.
    Это влияет на то, как мы думаем,
    чувствуем и действуем. Оно также помогает определить, как мы справляемся со
    стрессом, относимся к другим и делаем здоровый
    выбор.
    Психическое здоровье важно на
    каждом этапе жизни: с детства и подросткового возраста до взрослой жизни.ние) — специалист, занимающийся
    изучением проявлений, способов и форм организации психических
    явлений личности в различных областях человеческой деятельности для решения
    научно-исследовательских и прикладных задач,
    а также с целью оказания психологической помощи, поддержки и сопровождения.

  50. Моментально возводимые здания: бизнес-польза в каждой части!
    В сегодняшнем обществе, где часы – финансовые ресурсы, быстровозводимые здания стали решением по сути для фирм. Эти новаторские строения обладают высокую надежность, эффективное расходование средств и молниеносную установку, что позволяет им превосходным выбором для разнообразных предпринимательских инициатив.
    [url=https://bystrovozvodimye-zdanija-moskva.ru/]Легковозводимые здания из металлоконструкций[/url]
    1. Быстрота монтажа: Время – это самый важный ресурс в экономике, и быстровозводимые здания дают возможность значительно сократить время строительства. Это значительно ценится в ситуациях, когда важно быстро начать вести бизнес и начать зарабатывать.
    2. Экономия средств: За счет совершенствования производственных процессов элементов и сборки на площадке, экономические затраты на моментальные строения часто приходит вниз, по сравнению с традиционными строительными проектами. Это дает возможность сэкономить деньги и добиться более высокой доходности инвестиций.
    Подробнее на [url=https://bystrovozvodimye-zdanija-moskva.ru/]https://scholding.ru[/url]
    В заключение, быстровозводимые здания – это оптимальное решение для предпринимательских задач. Они объединяют в себе эффективное строительство, экономичность и повышенную надежность, что придает им способность отличным выбором для профессионалов, желающих быстро начать вести бизнес и получать доход. Не упустите возможность сократить затраты и время, оптимальные моментальные сооружения для вашего следующего делового мероприятия!

Newer Comments »

Comments are closed.