U.S. Rejects Emissions Pricing at IMO

66

  • U.S. exits IMO climate talks over concerns about a proposed global emissions pricing plan for shipping.
  • Officials warn the pricing scheme could harm exporters and raise global consumer costs.
  • U.S. signals possible trade response if the emissions levy is adopted without broad consensus.

In a dramatic development at the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee meeting in London, the U.S. administration has announced the United States’ withdrawal from crucial maritime decarbonization negotiations taking place this week, reports gCaptain.

The US government delivered a strongly worded message to IMO delegations, explicitly rejecting any measures that would impose fees on U.S. vessels based on greenhouse gas emissions or fuel choice.

Withdrawal from Climate Talks

The United States has officially exited a key International Maritime Organization (IMO) meeting focused on reducing emissions from the global shipping sector. The move comes amid growing debate over the introduction of a global emissions pricing mechanism.

Opposition to Emissions Pricing Plan

U.S. officials expressed concern that the proposed carbon levy would create economic imbalances. They argue the plan could raise costs for consumers and disproportionately affect developing economies and exporters.

Statement from U.S. Representatives

We remain committed to meaningful action on climate change,” a U.S. official stated. “However, the current proposal fails to strike the necessary balance between environmental responsibility and economic fairness.”

Threat of Trade Countermeasures

The U.S. warned it may consider trade-related responses if the IMO adopts the emissions pricing model without broader international agreement. Officials pointed to potential impacts on American maritime competitiveness.

Continued IMO Negotiations

Despite the U.S. withdrawal, the IMO continues its discussions with remaining member states. Some nations are now exploring revisions to the pricing scheme to address economic and fairness concerns raised during the talks.

Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?

It’s Free Click here to Subscribe!

Source: gCaptain