‘Fuel switching’ and ‘Loss Of Propulsion’ has come back to the spotlight of again and this is mainly attributed to the recent NTSB reports on a collision between a Bulk Carrier and an Oil Tanker in the Houston Ship Channel.
Capt. Jeff Cowan, who works for California’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response – has classified LOP under 6 groups for ease of understanding and discussion.
GROUP 1:
Engine failures resulting in the LOP (Loss of Propulsion) are due to the inability of the main engine, operating with MGO/MDO, to overcome the forces on the propeller from the forward momentum of the ship. The engine may turn over at higher RPM and initiate combustion; however, as the engine reduces speed to come to dead slow or slow astern there is not enough BTUs in the fuel to maintain engine inertia. The engine stalls with the subsequent loss of propulsion. Similarly, ships not getting engine starts while anchoring when an astern bell is given, typically initiates a “Failure to Start” scenario. The remedy due to the lack of BTUs is to adjust the fuel rack to allow more fuel into the cylinder. This procedure cannot be done from most ship bridges but only from the Engine Control Room or from the Engine Side (manual).
GROUP 2:
Failures resulting in the LOP are due to problems with controlling the temperature of the MGO/MDO. Each engine has specifications as to the temperature range required to operate using either heavy fuels or lighter fuels. For example, the optimal temperature range for an engine might be 135 degree Celsius for a heavy fuel oil (HFO) and 40 degree Celsius for the MGO. Because heavy fuels must be heated (for the right viscosity to burn) and lighter fuels may not need to be heated, there are problems associated during the fuel oil switch over in both heating and cooling the different fuel oil systems (since the fuel oil is supplied through the same auxiliary systems). Heating an MGO/MDO may cause “flashing” of the lighter fuel oil to vapor. The fuel injectors would not work when the fuel flashes causing a loss of power in that cylinder. Multiple cylinder flashes could result in LOP.
GROUP 3:
Failures resulting in a LOP are associated with the loss of fuel oil pressure to either the fuel pumps or fuel injectors. The loss of pressure could be a result of many factors including wrong control set points, use of bypass valves, inoperable equipment, inattention to operating conditions, or excessive leakage through “O” rings and seals. The problem lies with physics. Metal expands when heated and contracts when cooled. Ships evolved to burn the heaviest and cheapest fuel available, HFO. To utilize the HFO on ships, the fuel is heated to as much as 150 degree Celsius to get it to flow. In comparison, MGO/MDO fuel is burned at ambient engine room temperature or 40 degree Celsius and no additional heating is required. Once the cooler MGO is introduced into the fuel pumps and injectors, they contract causing a loss of fuel pressure at the pump with marginal spray pattern and leaks at the injector.
One of the other issues using MGO in an engine that has successfully run HFO for some time is viscosity. Typically the engine manufacturer’s recommended minimum viscosity is 2 centistokes (cst). Fuel viscosity specifications at 40 degree Celsius temperature for MGO/MDO range from 1.5 cst to 6.5 cst. The MGO loaded in California has a viscosity of 2cst to 3cst at 40 degree Celsius. When the temperature of the MGO is increased into an already warm engine that just ran on HFO, the heat lowers the viscosity causing the fuel machinery parts to bind or break. Keep in mind that the cylinder temperature is usually maintained at 80 degree Celsius and this heat migrates into the fuel lines as well.
Unsurprisingly, the introduction of distillate fuel into the fuel system causes leaks, sometimes excessive leaks. With MGO/MDO there is a very real risk of external combustion or fire. Replacing “O” rings at the manufacturer’s recommended intervals has proven not to be adequate. For example, in the case of injector “O” rings on a ship, the manufacturer suggested interval for replacing fuel injector “O” rings is 10,000 hours. The engineers on this ship found an interval of 2,000 hours was more appropriate to change injector “O” rings to prevent potential fire hazards. These fuel leaks tend to disappear when engines are switched back to the heavier fuel oil.
GROUP 4:
Failures resulting in LOP are associated with the loss of fuel oil pressure or the loss of flow in sufficient quantities to maintain operation. Strainers and filters or the lack of a strainer and filter contribute to clogging or restrictions in the fuel oil supply system. The MGO/MDO acts as a solvent causing a de-coking effect, clogging fuel filters. This is due to burning a lower grade of HFO that has excessive amounts of asphaltenes. These asphaltenes adhere to the inside of the fuel lines and assorted other fuel components. When MGO is introduced the asphaltenes are released, collecting in the fuel filters/strainers.
In recent years due increased demand for Marine Gas Oil (MGO), refiners have been squeezing more MGO out of the raw crude per barrel than ever before. While blenders/suppliers are wresting every dollar from product, there is a downside.
Within the last 18 months the issue is the difference between pour point and the cloud point of fuels which was fairly close, +/- 3°C; however, since the implementation of the ECA’s globally, this difference has expanded and can now be 20°C to 30°C higher than the pour point. This leads to waxy formations in fuel system strainers/filters, resulting in loss of power and propulsion. Heating the fuel past its cloud point could reduce viscosity which is addressed in Group 3.
GROUP 5:
Failures resulting in the Loss of Propulsion appear to be associated with problems in either the starting air system or the control air systems. Problems with starting air systems are not fuel related and only need to be mentioned as a cause of LOPs.
GROUP 6:
Failures resulting in the Loss of Propulsion appear to be associated with mechanical failure not associated with other groups. Since implementation in 2009 there have been many and varied reasons for ships suffering a Loss of Propulsion incident. Three scenarios stand out as most prevalent for determining risk:
- 70% experienced during inbound Transit.
- Most occur during slow speed maneuvering.
- Duration of transit/complexity of maneuvering.
Having defined the groups of LOPs, the intent of this guide was to reduce the LOP incidents occurring within the state of California boundaries. For California, many of the LOP incidents that occurred since 2009 involved “First Timers” (ships making first entry into California waters since July 2009). Since California sees between one to two first timers per week, a guide was created to provide suggestions for ships working with low sulfur distillate fuel oil (LSDFO), while trying to comply with the assorted ECA’s.
The Author:
Captain Jeff Cowan graduated from the California Maritime Academy in 1975, ultimately earning and sailing on his Master’s license. He remains involved in maritime issues and is a regular contributor to Marine News magazine, sister-publication to Maritime Reporter.
(As published in the July 2015 edition of Marine Technology Reporter –http://www.marinetechnologynews.com/Magazine)
Did you subscribe for our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!
Dear Frederic,
Thanks for your comments!
The above report was originally published in July 2015 and probably the statistics did not cover the complete year. Thus, it is more likely that there would be a spike in 2015 too!
It is interesting to notice the drop in the reported loss of propulsion incidents in 2015… since the HFO/MGO changeovers take place at 200 NM from the coastline ?
I would appreciate to have your opinions.
Best Regards