- South Korea leads in building 80% of the global LNG tanker fleet. Still, it faces challenges balancing its Global Methane Pledge to cut emissions by 30% by 2030 with the economic incentives of LNG demand.
- OECD discussions aim to phase out fossil fuel investments and pressure South Korea to align with global climate commitments.
- Investments in overseas fossil fuel projects by South Korea increased by 40% from 2017–2024, raising concerns from environmental groups.
South Korea, a leader in LNG carrier construction, faces a pivotal conflict: supporting its lucrative shipbuilding industry while adhering to methane reduction commitments under the Global Methane Pledge
South Korea’s Dual Dilemma: Economic Gains vs. Environmental Goals
With 384 LNG carriers currently on order, worth an estimated $60 billion, Korean shipyards dominate this space.
This growth is essential for maintaining the economic viability of LNG infrastructure investments.
Methane Commitments and Global Pressure
South Korea pledged a 30% reduction in methane emissions by 2030 but has increased investment in new fossil fuel projects.
Alongside Turkey, South Korea resisted OECD agreements to phase out oil and gas financing, leading to deadlocked climate discussions.
Environmental and Economic Crossroads
Climate NGO Warnings: Solutions For Our Climate (SFOC) warns that heavy investment in LNG risks creating stranded assets as global regulations tighten.
IEA Outlook: Fatih Birol of the International Energy Agency highlights that reducing methane emissions by 75% by 2030 could significantly curb global warming.
Future Fuel Transition: LNG to Methanol
Maritime carriers increasingly view LNG as a transitional fuel toward methanol, which is seen as a more sustainable alternative.
South Korea is set to produce over 1,000 LNG-powered vessels in the next five years, but market volatility and regulatory risks could undermine long-term reliance on LNG.
Carbon Pricing and ISO 14083
The introduction of ISO 14083, which standardizes GHG emissions measurement across supply chains, will further emphasize the carbon footprint of LNG carriers.
This could incentivize the shipping industry to accelerate its shift to alternative fuels.
Critical Insights for Stakeholders
Shipowners investing in LNG assets must consider the risks of market volatility and regulatory tightening.
South Korea’s resistance to ending fossil fuel investments highlights the complexities of balancing economic gains with environmental accountability.
Did you subscribe to our daily Newsletter?
It’s Free Click here to Subscribe!
Source: Seatrade Maritime
