- In addition to natural gas, alternative fuels and even barnacle-resistant paint are required for meeting the climate target.
- International shipping contributes nearly 3% and the number is expected to rise by 50% by mid-century but IMO has set a target of 50% cuts by 2050.
- Experts have recommended installing solar panels, using sails in addition to engines, better hull design and barnacle-repellent paint as preventive measures.
- The study forecasts 36% cuts short of the IMO’s 50% mark but new technologies like gas-to-hydrogen and renewables are required to reach the IMO’s target.
According to Euractiv, a new study showed that natural gas alone will not help shipping cut greenhouse gas emissions, which means that alternative fuels and even barnacle-resistant paint will be needed to meet ambitious climate targets.
Global emissions on the rise
International shipping contributes nearly 3% of the globe’s total emissions and that number is projected to increase by at least 50% by mid-century as things stand. But the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) wants to break the trend and has set a target of 50% cuts by 2050, compared with 2008 levels.
The sheer scale of global shipping makes the problem massive; nearly 90% of trade is conducted on the high seas and advances in engine technology cannot keep pace with the increase in vessel numbers.
Shipping’s impact is on the EU’s radar to an extent and the European Commission adopted measures on 4 February to make sure monitoring of shipping’s fuel consumption is done in line with new global norms.
The problem
Most ships use heavy fuel oil, which is a significant emitter of CO2 and other pollutants like nitrogen and sulphur oxides. A switch to alternative energy sources, like natural gas, has been mooted as a solution to shipping’s woes.
A new paper by Imperial College London has warned though that gas will not meet the IMO’s target by itself and other solutions like hydrogen power and energy efficiency measures will be needed.
Imperial’s Dr.Jamie Speirs said, “The greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas as a transport fuel are useful in the immediate term, but must be coupled with additional energy efficiency measures and longer-term plans that include much lower carbon truck and ship technologies“.
Efficiency measures
Efficiency measures include installing solar panels, using sails in addition to engines, better hull design and barnacle-repellent paint that prevents the sea creatures building upon a ship’s hull, which increases drag and, as a result, fuel consumption.
Even under the most ambitious scenario, the study forecasts 36% cuts, well short of the IMO’s 50% ask. That is why the authors suggest that the target could be reached if hydrogen fuel cells in shipping become widely available from 2040 onwards.
New technologies to reach the target
A spokesperson for the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers told EURACTIV that they will need new technologies like gas-to-hydrogen and renewables to reach the IMO’s target, adding that a fuel switch to gas and new hull and propeller design are also part of a basket of solutions.
Methane slip
The authors of the Imperial College study also pointed out that although natural gas can significantly cut the CO2 footprint of shipping, the release of methane can wipe out those gains or even leave the sector at a net loss in its emission reduction efforts.
That is because methane is a more potent greenhouse gas, which is released along with the whole natural gas value chain. The phenomenon known as ‘methane slip’ in a natural gas engine is also part of the problem, although technological advances promise to eliminate it eventually.
Indeed, the study found that so-called ‘dual-fuel’ vehicles could actually end up polluting more than even traditional vehicles, including trucks if the entire life-cycle emissions of the vehicles are considered.
Quality air
One mark in the fuel’s favor is its contribution to air pollution reduction, as natural gas releases far less harmful particulate matter than other fuels. The study estimated that it could result in cuts of over 90% for nitrogen, sulphur and particulate matter.
However, clean mobility NGO Transport & Environment said that air quality requirements can be met more easily with marine gas oil (MGO) or ultra-low sulphur fuels. Clean fuels expert Jori Sihvonen also told EURACTIV that ships will be able to carry less cargo as the fuel tanks take more space, suggesting that a switch the natural gas would not be a given for operators.
Sihvonen added that gas is not even a bridge [fuel], it is a distraction and pause button to continue business as usual. He added that it is more likely to take investment away from research and development that lead to uptake of zero-emission ships.
Conclusion
The IMO’s 50% target is currently aspirational at best and the finer details are yet to be hammered out. In the meantime, a more robust cap on sulphur emissions is set to come into force in 2020, which will force operators to either switch to cleaner fuel or install filters to meet a 0.5% sulphur content threshold.
Did you subscribe for our daily newsletter?
It’s Free! Click here to Subscribe!
Source: Euractiv
